↓ Skip to main content

Using Sequence Similarity Networks for Visualization of Relationships Across Diverse Protein Superfamilies

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
380 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
503 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using Sequence Similarity Networks for Visualization of Relationships Across Diverse Protein Superfamilies
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0004345
Pubmed ID
Authors

Holly J. Atkinson, John H. Morris, Thomas E. Ferrin, Patricia C. Babbitt

Abstract

The dramatic increase in heterogeneous types of biological data--in particular, the abundance of new protein sequences--requires fast and user-friendly methods for organizing this information in a way that enables functional inference. The most widely used strategy to link sequence or structure to function, homology-based function prediction, relies on the fundamental assumption that sequence or structural similarity implies functional similarity. New tools that extend this approach are still urgently needed to associate sequence data with biological information in ways that accommodate the real complexity of the problem, while being accessible to experimental as well as computational biologists. To address this, we have examined the application of sequence similarity networks for visualizing functional trends across protein superfamilies from the context of sequence similarity. Using three large groups of homologous proteins of varying types of structural and functional diversity--GPCRs and kinases from humans, and the crotonase superfamily of enzymes--we show that overlaying networks with orthogonal information is a powerful approach for observing functional themes and revealing outliers. In comparison to other primary methods, networks provide both a good representation of group-wise sequence similarity relationships and a strong visual and quantitative correlation with phylogenetic trees, while enabling analysis and visualization of much larger sets of sequences than trees or multiple sequence alignments can easily accommodate. We also define important limitations and caveats in the application of these networks. As a broadly accessible and effective tool for the exploration of protein superfamilies, sequence similarity networks show great potential for generating testable hypotheses about protein structure-function relationships.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 503 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 3%
Brazil 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 464 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 144 29%
Researcher 89 18%
Student > Master 66 13%
Student > Bachelor 45 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 4%
Other 63 13%
Unknown 74 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 150 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 117 23%
Chemistry 60 12%
Computer Science 32 6%
Engineering 9 2%
Other 52 10%
Unknown 83 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,843,500
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#23,523
of 199,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,258
of 172,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#82
of 537 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 537 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.