↓ Skip to main content

Climate Change on Twitter: Topics, Communities and Conversations about the 2013 IPCC Working Group 1 Report

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
41 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
203 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
324 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Climate Change on Twitter: Topics, Communities and Conversations about the 2013 IPCC Working Group 1 Report
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0094785
Pubmed ID
Authors

Warren Pearce, Kim Holmberg, Iina Hellsten, Brigitte Nerlich

Abstract

In September 2013 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published its Working Group 1 report, the first comprehensive assessment of physical climate science in six years, constituting a critical event in the societal debate about climate change. This paper analyses the nature of this debate in one public forum: Twitter. Using statistical methods, tweets were analyzed to discover the hashtags used when people tweeted about the IPCC report, and how Twitter users formed communities around their conversational connections. In short, the paper presents the topics and tweeters at this particular moment in the climate debate. The most used hashtags related to themes of science, geographical location and social issues connected to climate change. Particularly noteworthy were tweets connected to Australian politics, US politics, geoengineering and fracking. Three communities of Twitter users were identified. Researcher coding of Twitter users showed how these varied according to geographical location and whether users were supportive, unsupportive or neutral in their tweets about the IPCC. Overall, users were most likely to converse with users holding similar views. However, qualitative analysis suggested the emergence of a community of Twitter users, predominantly based in the UK, where greater interaction between contrasting views took place. This analysis also illustrated the presence of a campaign by the non-governmental organization Avaaz, aimed at increasing media coverage of the IPCC report.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 312 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 21%
Student > Master 46 14%
Researcher 45 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 76 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 74 23%
Environmental Science 35 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 6%
Computer Science 19 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 5%
Other 68 21%
Unknown 91 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2023.
All research outputs
#886,821
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,534
of 225,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,266
of 242,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#312
of 5,343 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,343 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.