@TempMental @whenthepainends @TheWilliamGray @_sn_n Yes you could think that. If you are either retarded or evil. We never know with catholics. https://t.co/x3CJzrhlXB(95%25%20CI%2C%20. 65-90% reduction in transmission. https://t.co/r3SkwmlZXi 80% https:/
@DGB_Hunter @MindeCapitalH https://t.co/O6DEJTtzve https://t.co/iDVBBAhRTh https://t.co/w4qw2Vv8Bl https://t.co/ehPuljokdR https://t.co/8Cyrl5BXWP https://t.co/1YpSxSc597 (parte sobre la base de no "confiar" en ciertos estudios relacionado, pero llega a ca
@PedroHTunes Interessante, mas preocupante, até com prep e preservativo o artigo cita 92%. Esse artigo discute vários outros artigos e coloca em geral como 80%, foda q discute a dificuldade de se isolar variáveis. https://t.co/aJJHsJZGms
@yazaisus @MatichonOnline •People who always used condoms had an HIV incidence of 1.14 per 100 person-years, while people who never used condoms had a higher and more variable HIV incidence of 5.75 per 100 person-years. •Condoms reduced the risk of HIV inf