You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Susceptibility to Chronic Mucus Hypersecretion, a Genome Wide Association Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0091621 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akkelies E. Dijkstra, Joanna Smolonska, Maarten van den Berge, Ciska Wijmenga, Pieter Zanen, Marjan A. Luinge, Mathieu Platteel, Jan-Willem Lammers, Magnus Dahlback, Kerrie Tosh, Pieter S. Hiemstra, Peter J. Sterk, Avi Spira, Jorgen Vestbo, Borge G. Nordestgaard, Marianne Benn, Sune F. Nielsen, Morten Dahl, W. Monique Verschuren, H. Susan J. Picavet, Henriette A. Smit, Michael Owsijewitsch, Hans U. Kauczor, Harry J. de Koning, Eva Nizankowska-Mogilnicka, Filip Mejza, Pawel Nastalek, Cleo C. van Diemen, Michael H. Cho, Edwin K. Silverman, James D. Crapo, Terri H. Beaty, David A. Lomas, Per Bakke, Amund Gulsvik, Yohan Bossé, M. A. Obeidat, Daan W. Loth, Lies Lahousse, Fernando Rivadeneira, Andre G. Uitterlinden, Andre Hofman, Bruno H. Stricker, Guy G. Brusselle, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Uilke Brouwer, Gerard H. Koppelman, Judith M. Vonk, Martijn C. Nawijn, Harry J. M. Groen, Wim Timens, H. Marike Boezen, Dirkje S. Postma |
| Abstract |
Chronic mucus hypersecretion (CMH) is associated with an increased frequency of respiratory infections, excess lung function decline, and increased hospitalisation and mortality rates in the general population. It is associated with smoking, but it is unknown why only a minority of smokers develops CMH. A plausible explanation for this phenomenon is a predisposing genetic constitution. Therefore, we performed a genome wide association (GWA) study of CMH in Caucasian populations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,779,591
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#123,458
of 194,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,006
of 228,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,209
of 5,345 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,345 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.