↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of Family-Based Treatment for Adolescents With Anorexia Nervosa

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Healthcare, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementation of Family-Based Treatment for Adolescents With Anorexia Nervosa
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Healthcare, September 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.pedhc.2013.07.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth K. Hughes, Daniel Le Grange, Andrew Court, Michele Yeo, Stephanie Campbell, Melissa Whitelaw, Linsey Atkins, Susan M. Sawyer

Abstract

Although the implementation of new treatment models can be a challenging process for health care services, the outcomes can be greatly beneficial to patients and service providers. This article describes the process of change experienced within our multidisciplinary specialist eating disorder service when we implemented a new evidence-based model of care focusing on outpatient family-based treatment (FBT). Clinical outcomes were positive, including a 56% decrease in admissions, a 75% decrease in readmissions, and a 51% decrease in total bed days. Of families referred to FBT, 83% completed treatment and 97% of completers achieved >90% of their expected body weight. Despite these gains, many challenges were experienced, including misgivings about the suitability of FBT and difficulties in adhering to changes in professional roles. We describe these challenges, describe how they were overcome, and review factors perceived to be critical to the program's success, including integration of medical and mental health services, communication, and training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 19%
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Other 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 32 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,829,836
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Healthcare
#67
of 779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,352
of 216,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Healthcare
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.