↓ Skip to main content

The BCTRIMS expanded consensus on treatment of multiple sclerosis: II. The evidences for the use of glucocorticoids and immunomodulatory treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The BCTRIMS expanded consensus on treatment of multiple sclerosis: II. The evidences for the use of glucocorticoids and immunomodulatory treatments
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, October 2002
DOI 10.1590/s0004-282x2002000500036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcos Aurélio Moreira, Marco Aurélio Lana-Peixoto, Dagoberto Callegaro, Sérgio Roberto Haussen, Paulo Diniz Gama, Alberto Alain Gabbai, Fernando Coronetti Gomes Rocha, Angelina Maria Martins Lino

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory disease in which immunological mechanisms play an important role in causing demyelinating lesions in the central nervous system. A number of drugs acting in different stages of these mechanisms have been tested for its treatment. This paper analyses the most important clinical trials with glucocorticoids and immunomodulatory treatments, including human immunoglobulin, using the classes of evidences and types of recommendations as have been defined and widely accepted by the international scientific community. It aims to provide sufficient information to support the BCTRIMS Expanded Consensus on Treatment of MS.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%