You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Langerhans Cell Homeostasis and Turnover After Nonmyeloablative and Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Transplantation, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1097/tp.0000000000000097 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marco Mielcarek, Anna Yasmine Kirkorian, Robert C. Hackman, Jeremy Price, Barry E. Storer, Brent L. Wood, Marylene Leboeuf, Milena Bogunovic, Rainer Storb, Yoshihiro Inamoto, Mary E. Flowers, Paul J. Martin, Matthew Collin, Miriam Merad |
Abstract |
Langerhans cells (LCs) are self-renewing epidermal myeloid cells that can migrate and mature into dendritic cells. Recipient LCs that survive cytotoxic therapy given in preparation for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation may prime donor T cells to mediate cutaneous graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). This possible association, however, has not been investigated in the setting of nonmyeloablative allografting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 34 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 23% |
Researcher | 6 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 17% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 31% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 29% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Transplantation
#5,490
of 7,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,327
of 258,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transplantation
#54
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.