↓ Skip to main content

Ca2+ Binding Enhanced Mechanical Stability of an Archaeal Crystallin

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ca2+ Binding Enhanced Mechanical Stability of an Archaeal Crystallin
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0094513
Pubmed ID
Authors

Venkatraman Ramanujam, Hema Chandra Kotamarthi, Sri Rama Koti Ainavarapu

Abstract

Structural topology plays an important role in protein mechanical stability. Proteins with β-sandwich topology consisting of Greek key structural motifs, for example, I27 of muscle titin and (10)FNIII of fibronectin, are mechanically resistant as shown by single-molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS). In proteins with β-sandwich topology, if the terminal strands are directly connected by backbone H-bonding then this geometry can serve as a "mechanical clamp". Proteins with this geometry are shown to have very high unfolding forces. Here, we set out to explore the mechanical properties of a protein, M-crystallin, which belongs to β-sandwich topology consisting of Greek key motifs but its overall structure lacks the "mechanical clamp" geometry at the termini. M-crystallin is a Ca(2+) binding protein from Methanosarcina acetivorans that is evolutionarily related to the vertebrate eye lens β and γ-crystallins. We constructed an octamer of crystallin, (M-crystallin)8, and using SMFS, we show that M-crystallin unfolds in a two-state manner with an unfolding force ∼ 90 pN (at a pulling speed of 1000 nm/sec), which is much lower than that of I27. Our study highlights that the β-sandwich topology proteins with a different strand-connectivity than that of I27 and (10)FNIII, as well as lacking "mechanical clamp" geometry, can be mechanically resistant. Furthermore, Ca(2+) binding not only stabilizes M-crystallin by 11.4 kcal/mol but also increases its unfolding force by ∼ 35 pN at the same pulling speed. The differences in the mechanical properties of apo and holo M-crystallins are further characterized using pulling speed dependent measurements and they show that Ca(2+) binding reduces the unfolding potential width from 0.55 nm to 0.38 nm. These results are explained using a simple two-state unfolding energy landscape.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 40%
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Physics and Astronomy 2 10%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2014.
All research outputs
#17,719,424
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,852
of 194,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,956
of 226,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,795
of 5,253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.