↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory rehabilitation after acute exacerbation of COPD may reduce risk for readmission and mortality – a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
194 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Respiratory rehabilitation after acute exacerbation of COPD may reduce risk for readmission and mortality – a systematic review
Published in
Respiratory Research, June 2005
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-6-54
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milo A Puhan, Madlaina Scharplatz, Thierry Troosters, Johann Steurer

Abstract

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) represent a major burden for patients and health care systems. Respiratory rehabilitation may improve prognosis in these patients by addressing relevant risk factors for exacerbations such as low exercise capacity. To study whether respiratory rehabilitation after acute exacerbation improves prognosis and health status compared to usual care, we quantified its effects using meta-analyses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 252 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 18%
Student > Bachelor 41 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 10%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Postgraduate 22 8%
Other 62 23%
Unknown 43 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 130 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Psychology 7 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 2%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 56 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,801,765
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#157
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,691
of 67,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.