↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Genomics of Bordetella pertussis Reveals Progressive Gene Loss in Finnish Strains

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Genomics of Bordetella pertussis Reveals Progressive Gene Loss in Finnish Strains
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0000904
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eriikka Heikkinen, Teemu Kallonen, Lilli Saarinen, Rolf Sara, Audrey J. King, Frits R. Mooi, Juhani T. Soini, Jussi Mertsola, Qiushui He

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 2%
France 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 25%
Professor 7 15%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2014.
All research outputs
#3,695,894
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#45,775
of 194,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,781
of 70,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#76
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.