You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A cost-utility analysis of drug treatments in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B in Thailand
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-170 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Narisa Tantai, Usa Chaikledkaew, Tawesak Tanwandee, Pitsaphun Werayingyong, Yot Teerawattananon |
Abstract |
Only lamivudine has been included for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in the National List of Essential Drugs (NLED), a pharmaceutical reimbursement list in Thailand. There have also been no economic evaluation studies of CHB drug treatments conducted in Thailand yet. In order to fill this gap in policy research, the objective of this study was to compare the cost-utility of each drug therapy (Figure 1) with palliative care in patients with HBeAg-positive CHB. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 99 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 18% |
Researcher | 17 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 13% |
Unknown | 32 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 25% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 6% |
Psychology | 5 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 12% |
Unknown | 33 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2015.
All research outputs
#15,299,491
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,546
of 7,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,847
of 226,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#98
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.