You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impacts of Removing Badgers on Localised Counts of Hedgehogs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0095477 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iain D. Trewby, Richard Young, Robbie A. McDonald, Gavin J. Wilson, John Davison, Neil Walker, Andrew Robertson, C. Patrick Doncaster, Richard J. Delahay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 289 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 109 | 38% |
| United States | 20 | 7% |
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| Ireland | 3 | 1% |
| Namibia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 246 | 85% |
| Scientists | 26 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 22% |
| Researcher | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 296. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2024.
All research outputs
#120,938
of 25,934,828 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,883
of 226,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#935
of 240,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#43
of 4,998 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,934,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,998 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.