You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Chocolate Milk Consequences: A Pilot Study Evaluating the Consequences of Banning Chocolate Milk in School Cafeterias
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0091022 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew S. Hanks, David R. Just, Brian Wansink |
Abstract |
Currently, 68.3% of the milk available in schools is flavored, with chocolate being the most popular (61.6% of all milk). If chocolate milk is removed from a school cafeteria, what will happen to overall milk selection and consumption? |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 23 | 47% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Canada | 2 | 4% |
Comoros | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 27% |
Scientists | 6 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Finland | 1 | 1% |
New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 92 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 22% |
Researcher | 14 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 23 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 9% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 18% |
Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 258. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#144,232
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,220
of 224,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,047
of 225,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#48
of 4,999 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,999 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.