↓ Skip to main content

Rapid diagnostic tests versus clinical diagnosis for managing people with fever in malaria endemic settings

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
378 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid diagnostic tests versus clinical diagnosis for managing people with fever in malaria endemic settings
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008998.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Odaga, David Sinclair, Joseph A Lokong, Sarah Donegan, Heidi Hopkins, Paul Garner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 364 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 21%
Researcher 49 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Student > Postgraduate 31 8%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Other 83 22%
Unknown 71 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 142 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 7%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 3%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 90 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,767,489
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,674
of 13,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,046
of 239,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.