↓ Skip to main content

Hand and ultrasonic instrumentation for orthograde root canal treatment of permanent teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hand and ultrasonic instrumentation for orthograde root canal treatment of permanent teeth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006384.pub3
Authors

Vinícius Pedrazzi, Jeronimo M Oliveira-Neto, Patrick Sequeira, Zbys Fedorowicz, Mona Nasser

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 71%
Psychology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#4,800,967
of 18,780,663 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,992
of 11,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,458
of 201,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,780,663 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.