↓ Skip to main content

Hand and ultrasonic instrumentation for orthograde root canal treatment of permanent teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hand and ultrasonic instrumentation for orthograde root canal treatment of permanent teeth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006384.pub3
Authors

Vinícius Pedrazzi, Jeronimo M Oliveira-Neto, Patrick Sequeira, Zbys Fedorowicz, Mona Nasser

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 26%
Student > Postgraduate 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Other 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 81%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#3,812,183
of 15,330,882 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,308
of 11,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,455
of 192,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#124
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,330,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.