You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-015-0295-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas J. Waltz, Byron J. Powell, Monica M. Matthieu, Laura J. Damschroder, Matthew J. Chinman, Jeffrey L. Smith, Enola K. Proctor, JoAnn E. Kirchner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 38% |
| Canada | 5 | 13% |
| Australia | 4 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 51% |
| Scientists | 13 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 535 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 528 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 17% |
| Researcher | 89 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 6% |
| Other | 101 | 19% |
| Unknown | 122 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 70 | 13% |
| Psychology | 66 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 64 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 66 | 12% |
| Unknown | 157 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,604,860
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#273
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,914
of 276,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.