↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes in a Cohort of Women Who Discontinued Maternal Triple-Antiretroviral Regimens Initially Used to Prevent Mother-to-Child Transmission during Pregnancy and Breastfeeding—Kenya, 2003–2009

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outcomes in a Cohort of Women Who Discontinued Maternal Triple-Antiretroviral Regimens Initially Used to Prevent Mother-to-Child Transmission during Pregnancy and Breastfeeding—Kenya, 2003–2009
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0093556
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy D. Minniear, Sonali Girde, Frank Angira, Lisa A. Mills, Clement Zeh, Philip J. Peters, Rose Masaba, Richard Lando, Timothy K. Thomas, Allan W. Taylor, for the Kisumu Breastfeeding Study Team

Abstract

In 2012, the World Health Organization (WHO) amended their 2010 guidelines for women receiving limited duration, triple-antiretroviral drug regimens during pregnancy and breastfeeding for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (tARV-PMTCT) (Option B) to include the option to continue lifelong combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) (Option B+). We evaluated clinical and CD4 outcomes in women who had received antiretrovirals for prevention of mother-to-child transmission and then discontinued antiretrovirals 6-months postpartum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 111 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 21%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 25 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 17%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Psychology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 28 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2014.
All research outputs
#5,973,273
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#71,552
of 194,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,097
of 226,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,564
of 5,111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.