You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Juggling Act of Supervision in Community Mental Health: Implications for Supporting Evidence-Based Treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-017-0796-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shannon Dorsey, Michael D. Pullmann, Suzanne E. U. Kerns, Nathaniel Jungbluth, Rosemary Meza, Kelly Thompson, Lucy Berliner |
| Abstract |
Supervisors are an underutilized resource for supporting evidence-based treatments (EBTs) in community mental health. Little is known about how EBT-trained supervisors use supervision time. Primary aims were to describe supervision (e.g., modality, frequency), examine functions of individual supervision, and examine factors associated with time allocation to supervision functions. Results from 56 supervisors and 207 clinicians from 25 organizations indicate high prevalence of individual supervision, often alongside group and informal supervision. Individual supervision serves a wide range of functions, with substantial variation at the supervisor-level. Implementation climate was the strongest predictor of time allocation to clinical and EBT-relevant functions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 36 | 44% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2017.
All research outputs
#17,285,273
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#533
of 715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,353
of 337,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.