You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diffusion of e-health innovations in ‘post-conflict’ settings: a qualitative study on the personal experiences of health workers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Resources for Health, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-12-22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aniek Woodward, Molly Fyfe, Jibril Handuleh, Preeti Patel, Brian Godman, Andrew Leather, Alexander Finlayson |
| Abstract |
Technological innovations have the potential to strengthen human resources for health and improve access and quality of care in challenging 'post-conflict' contexts. However, analyses on the adoption of technology for health (that is, 'e-health') and whether and how e-health can strengthen a health workforce in these settings have been limited so far. This study explores the personal experiences of health workers using e-health innovations in selected post-conflict situations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 13% |
| Singapore | 2 | 9% |
| Colombia | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 22% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Somalia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 221 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 25% |
| Researcher | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 24 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 16% |
| Unknown | 55 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,568,788
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#139
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,281
of 241,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.