You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Numerical methods to simulate moisture dynamics in fibrous sheet
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mathematics in Industry, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13362-017-0040-1 |
| Authors |
Hidekazu Yoshioka, Kotaro Fukada, Ichiro Kita |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 25% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 3 | 38% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#14,949,631
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematics in Industry
#23
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,120
of 316,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematics in Industry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them