You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-intensity interval training and β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyric free acid improves aerobic power and metabolic thresholds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-11-16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward H Robinson, Jeffrey R Stout, Amelia A Miramonti, David H Fukuda, Ran Wang, Jeremy R Townsend, Gerald T Mangine, Maren S Fragala, Jay R Hoffman |
| Abstract |
Previous research combining Calcium β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (CaHMB) and running high-intensity interval training (HIIT) have shown positive effects on aerobic performance measures. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyric free acid (HMBFA) and cycle ergometry HIIT on maximal oxygen consumption (VO2peak), ventilatory threshold (VT), respiratory compensation point (RCP) and time to exhaustion (Tmax) in college-aged men and women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 157 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 57 | 36% |
| United States | 8 | 5% |
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 69 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 117 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 17% |
| Scientists | 14 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 199 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 85 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2018.
All research outputs
#344,577
of 25,657,205 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#113
of 950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,597
of 449,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#111
of 852 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,657,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 852 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.