↓ Skip to main content

Treatment for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005284.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela E Ballinger, Suetonia C Palmer, Kathryn J Wiggins, Jonathan C Craig, David W Johnson, Nicholas B Cross, Giovanni FM Strippoli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
Brunei Darussalam 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 157 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Other 14 9%
Other 36 23%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 29 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,532,081
of 13,649,061 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,181
of 10,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,810
of 189,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#89
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,649,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.