↓ Skip to main content

Security and Privacy Issues in Wireless Sensor Networks for Healthcare Applications

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
492 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
547 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Security and Privacy Issues in Wireless Sensor Networks for Healthcare Applications
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10916-010-9449-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moshaddique Al Ameen, Jingwei Liu, Kyungsup Kwak

Abstract

The use of wireless sensor networks (WSN) in healthcare applications is growing in a fast pace. Numerous applications such as heart rate monitor, blood pressure monitor and endoscopic capsule are already in use. To address the growing use of sensor technology in this area, a new field known as wireless body area networks (WBAN or simply BAN) has emerged. As most devices and their applications are wireless in nature, security and privacy concerns are among major areas of concern. Due to direct involvement of humans also increases the sensitivity. Whether the data gathered from patients or individuals are obtained with the consent of the person or without it due to the need by the system, misuse or privacy concerns may restrict people from taking advantage of the full benefits from the system. People may not see these devices safe for daily use. There may also possibility of serious social unrest due to the fear that such devices may be used for monitoring and tracking individuals by government agencies or other private organizations. In this paper we discuss these issues and analyze in detail the problems and their possible measures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 547 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Malaysia 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 516 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 111 20%
Student > Master 110 20%
Student > Bachelor 54 10%
Researcher 41 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 93 17%
Unknown 112 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 235 43%
Engineering 84 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 23 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 3%
Social Sciences 16 3%
Other 39 7%
Unknown 133 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,228,822
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#994
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,567
of 93,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.