↓ Skip to main content

Digitalis for treatment of heart failure in patients in sinus rhythm

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Digitalis for treatment of heart failure in patients in sinus rhythm
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002901.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

William B Hood Jr., Antonio L Dans, Gordon H Guyatt, Roman Jaeschke, John JV McMurray

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Colombia 2 2%
Italy 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 84 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Postgraduate 11 12%
Other 9 10%
Other 30 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 62%
Unspecified 11 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 11 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,338,268
of 13,205,324 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,176
of 10,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,037
of 189,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,205,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.