↓ Skip to main content

Digitalis for treatment of heart failure in patients in sinus rhythm

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Digitalis for treatment of heart failure in patients in sinus rhythm
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002901.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

William B Hood Jr., Antonio L Dans, Gordon H Guyatt, Roman Jaeschke, John JV McMurray

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Colombia 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 98 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Other 27 25%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 58%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 15 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,870,340
of 15,220,159 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,671
of 11,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,026
of 191,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,220,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.