↓ Skip to main content

Screening for EGFR and KRAS Mutations in Endobronchial Ultrasound Derived Transbronchial Needle Aspirates in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using COLD-PCR

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening for EGFR and KRAS Mutations in Endobronchial Ultrasound Derived Transbronchial Needle Aspirates in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using COLD-PCR
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025191
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Santis, Roger Angell, Guillermina Nickless, Alison Quinn, Amanda Herbert, Paul Cane, James Spicer, Ronan Breen, Emma McLean, Khalid Tobal

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Other 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,536,586
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,144
of 196,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,968
of 131,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,030
of 2,548 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,548 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.