↓ Skip to main content

Perceptions of individuals living with spinal cord injury toward preference-based quality of life instruments: a qualitative exploration

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perceptions of individuals living with spinal cord injury toward preference-based quality of life instruments: a qualitative exploration
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-12-50
Pubmed ID
Authors

David GT Whitehurst, Nitya Suryaprakash, Lidia Engel, Nicole Mittmann, Vanessa K Noonan, Marcel FS Dvorak, Stirling Bryan

Abstract

Generic preference-based health-related quality of life instruments are widely used to measure health benefit within economic evaluation. The availability of multiple instruments raises questions about their relative merits and recent studies have highlighted the paucity of evidence regarding measurement properties in the context of spinal cord injury (SCI). This qualitative study explores the views of individuals living with SCI towards six established instruments with the objective of identifying 'preferred' outcome measures (from the perspective of the study participants).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 8%
Psychology 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 12 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,258,327
of 13,693,516 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#799
of 1,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,307
of 189,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,693,516 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,475 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them