↓ Skip to main content

Early erythropoietin for preventing red blood cell transfusion in preterm and/or low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early erythropoietin for preventing red blood cell transfusion in preterm and/or low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004863.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arne Ohlsson, Sanjay M Aher

Abstract

Low plasma levels of erythropoietin (EPO) in preterm infants provide a rationale for the use of EPO to prevent or treat anaemia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 95 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Postgraduate 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 15 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,598,694
of 14,370,331 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,324
of 10,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,527
of 190,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#141
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,370,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.