↓ Skip to main content

Root resorption, treatment time and extraction rate during orthodontic treatment with self-ligating and conventional brackets

Overview of attention for article published in Head & Face Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Root resorption, treatment time and extraction rate during orthodontic treatment with self-ligating and conventional brackets
Published in
Head & Face Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1746-160x-10-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Collin Jacobs, Philipp F Gebhardt, Viviana Jacobs, Marlene Hechtner, Dan Meila, Heinrich Wehrbein

Abstract

This study determined the amount and severity of EARR (external apical root resorption) after orthodontic treatment with self-ligating (SL) and conventional (Non-SL) brackets. Differences regarding rate of extraction cases, appointments and treatment time were evaluated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 22%
Student > Postgraduate 22 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 29 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 70%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Psychology 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,299,919
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Head & Face Medicine
#127
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,741
of 305,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Face Medicine
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.