You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Continuum of Physiological Impairment during Treadmill Walking in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COPD: Patient Characterization Phase of a Randomized Clinical Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0096574 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Denis E. O’Donnell, François Maltais, Janos Porszasz, Katherine A. Webb, Frank C. Albers, Qiqi Deng, Ahmar Iqbal, Heather A. Paden, Richard Casaburi, on behalf of the 205.440 investigators |
Abstract |
To have a better understanding of the mechanisms of exercise limitation in mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), we compared detailed respiratory physiology in patients with COPD and healthy age- and sex-matched controls. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 78 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
Researcher | 10 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
Professor | 7 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 16% |
Unknown | 23 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Psychology | 3 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 30 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,228,822
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#173,311
of 194,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,736
of 227,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,219
of 4,875 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,875 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.