↓ Skip to main content

Accurate single-shot quantitative phase imaging of biological specimens with telecentric digital holographic microscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Optics, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accurate single-shot quantitative phase imaging of biological specimens with telecentric digital holographic microscopy
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Optics, April 2014
DOI 10.1117/1.jbo.19.4.046022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Doblas, Emilio Sánchez-Ortiga, Manuel Martínez-Corral, Genaro Saavedra, Jorge Garcia-Sucerquia

Abstract

The advantages of using a telecentric imaging system in digital holographic microscopy (DHM) to study biological specimens are highlighted. To this end, the performances of nontelecentric DHM and telecentric DHM are evaluated from the quantitative phase imaging (QPI) point of view. The evaluated stability of the microscope allows single-shot QPI in DHM by using telecentric imaging systems. Quantitative phase maps of a section of the head of the drosophila melanogaster fly and of red blood cells are obtained via single-shot DHM with no numerical postprocessing. With these maps we show that the use of telecentric DHM provides larger field of view for a given magnification and permits more accurate QPI measurements with less number of computational operations.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 22 44%
Engineering 10 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2014.
All research outputs
#10,722,105
of 12,091,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Optics
#1,241
of 1,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,419
of 199,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Optics
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,091,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.