↓ Skip to main content

Red blood cell transfusions and the risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome among the critically ill: a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Red blood cell transfusions and the risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome among the critically ill: a cohort study
Published in
Critical Care, June 2007
DOI 10.1186/cc5934
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marya D Zilberberg, Chureen Carter, Patrick Lefebvre, Monika Raut, Francis Vekeman, Mei Sheng Duh, Andrew F Shorr

Abstract

Recent data indicate that transfusion of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) may increase the risk for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in critically ill patients. Uncertainty remains regarding the strength of this relationship.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 3%
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 58 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 23%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Professor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 18 28%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Engineering 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,041
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,422
of 82,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.