↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Comparison between single and three portal laparoscopic splenectomy in dogs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison between single and three portal laparoscopic splenectomy in dogs
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-8-161
Pubmed ID
22963734
Authors

Alireza Khalaj, Jalal Bakhtiari, Amir Niasari-Naslaji

Abstract

Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a newly growing technique to replace a more invasive conventional multiple portal laparoscopic surgery. The objective of this study was to compare single (SILS) with three portal (Conventional) laparoscopic splenectomy in dogs. Mongrel dogs (n = 18), weighting 15 ± 3 kg, were selected for this study (n = 12 SILS; n = 6 conventional). The area from xiphoid to pubis was prepared under aseptic conditions in dorsal recumbency with the head down and tilted 30 degree in the right lateral position. Pneumoperitoneum was established by CO₂ using an automatic high flow pressure until achieving 12 mm Hg. Instrumentation used consisted of curved flexible-tip 5 mm Maryland forceps and ultracision harmonic scalpel for sealing and cutting of the vessels and splenic attachments.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 24%
Other 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2014.
All research outputs
#1,676,718
of 3,720,643 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#220
of 620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,760
of 95,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#11
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,720,643 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 53rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 620 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.