You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Steroidal contraceptives: effect on carbohydrate metabolism in women without diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006133.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laureen M Lopez, David A Grimes, Kenneth F Schulz |
| Abstract |
Many hormonal contraceptives have been associated with changes in carbohydrate metabolism. Alterations may include decreased glucose tolerance and increased insulin resistance, which are risk factors for Type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. These issues have been raised primarily with contraceptives containing estrogen. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 363 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 357 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 15% |
| Researcher | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 72 | 20% |
| Unknown | 100 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 47 | 13% |
| Unknown | 110 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,398,309
of 25,450,869 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,855
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,546
of 241,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#87
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,450,869 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.