↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire

Overview of attention for article published in Health Expectations, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire
Published in
Health Expectations, March 2014
DOI 10.1111/hex.12183
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos De las Cuevas, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez, Amado Rivero-Santana, Ausiàs Cebolla-Martí, Isabelle Scholl, Martin Härter

Abstract

To translate and assess the psychometric properties of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) for measuring patients' perceptions of how clinicians' performance fits the SDM process.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 3%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 108 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 23%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Professor 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 33 29%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Psychology 12 11%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 19 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2015.
All research outputs
#3,518,370
of 12,353,024 outputs
Outputs from Health Expectations
#363
of 785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,072
of 197,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Expectations
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,353,024 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.