↓ Skip to main content

Botulinum toxin for upper oesophageal sphincter dysfunction in neurological swallowing disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Botulinum toxin for upper oesophageal sphincter dysfunction in neurological swallowing disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009968.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Regan, Anne Murphy, Mindy Chiang, Barry P McMahon, Tara Coughlan, Margaret Walshe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 134 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Psychology 12 9%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 31 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,230,436
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,529
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,716
of 189,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#154
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.