You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quality of Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Services during Scale-Up: A Comparative Process Evaluation in Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania and Zimbabwe
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0079524 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Larissa Jennings, Jane Bertrand, Dino Rech, Steven A. Harvey, Karin Hatzold, Christopher A. Samkange, Dickens S. Omondi Aduda, Bennett Fimbo, Peter Cherutich, Linnea Perry, Delivette Castor, Emmanuel Njeuhmeli |
Abstract |
The rapid expansion of voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) has raised concerns whether health systems can deliver and sustain VMMC according to minimum quality criteria. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 43% |
Kenya | 1 | 14% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 14% |
South Africa | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 84 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 22 | 26% |
Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 12% |
Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 11% |
Psychology | 4 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 19 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,604,893
of 23,505,010 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#66,823
of 201,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,599
of 228,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,186
of 4,752 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,010 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,752 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.