↓ Skip to main content

Effects of satellite transmitters on captive and wild mallards

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Society Bulletin, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of satellite transmitters on captive and wild mallards
Published in
Wildlife Society Bulletin, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/wsb.437
Authors

Dylan C. Kesler, Andrew H. Raedeke, Jennifer R. Foggia, William S. Beatty, Elisabeth B. Webb, Dale D. Humburg, Luke W. Naylor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Switzerland 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 59 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 24%
Student > Master 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Other 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 56%
Environmental Science 12 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2014.
All research outputs
#6,764,958
of 13,425,774 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#256
of 607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,541
of 188,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,425,774 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 607 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.