You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Every-other-day feeding extends lifespan but fails to delay many symptoms of aging in mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-017-00178-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kan Xie, Frauke Neff, Astrid Markert, Jan Rozman, Juan Antonio Aguilar-Pimentel, Oana Veronica Amarie, Lore Becker, Robert Brommage, Lillian Garrett, Kristin S. Henzel, Sabine M. Hölter, Dirk Janik, Isabelle Lehmann, Kristin Moreth, Brandon L. Pearson, Ildiko Racz, Birgit Rathkolb, Devon P. Ryan, Susanne Schröder, Irina Treise, Raffi Bekeredjian, Dirk H. Busch, Jochen Graw, Gerhard Ehninger, Martin Klingenspor, Thomas Klopstock, Markus Ollert, Michael Sandholzer, Carsten Schmidt-Weber, Marco Weiergräber, Eckhard Wolf, Wolfgang Wurst, Andreas Zimmer, Valerie Gailus-Durner, Helmut Fuchs, Martin Hrabě de Angelis, Dan Ehninger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 197 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 7% |
| India | 7 | 4% |
| Japan | 6 | 3% |
| Australia | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 99 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 140 | 71% |
| Scientists | 40 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 222. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#178,941
of 26,009,886 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,544
of 59,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,654
of 331,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#38
of 836 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,009,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59,521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 836 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.