You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Demystifying traditional herbal medicine with modern approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Plants, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nplants.2017.109 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fu-Shuang Li, Jing-Ke Weng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 141 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 18% |
| India | 17 | 12% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Japan | 4 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 63 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 106 | 75% |
| Scientists | 28 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 466 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 466 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 11% |
| Researcher | 44 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 76 | 16% |
| Unknown | 167 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 64 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 48 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 22 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 62 | 13% |
| Unknown | 184 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2023.
All research outputs
#380,238
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
#204
of 2,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,994
of 327,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
#4
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.