You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic evaluation of implementation fidelity of complex interventions in health and social care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-67 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henna Hasson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 2% |
| Canada | 6 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 430 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 76 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 75 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 89 | 20% |
| Unknown | 83 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 93 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 12% |
| Psychology | 37 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 46 | 10% |
| Unknown | 104 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,232,080
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,426
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,442
of 108,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.