↓ Skip to main content

The Real-World Problem of Care Coordination: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study with Patients Living with Advanced Progressive Illness and Their Unpaid Caregivers

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Real-World Problem of Care Coordination: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study with Patients Living with Advanced Progressive Illness and Their Unpaid Caregivers
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0095523
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara A. Daveson, Richard Harding, Cathy Shipman, Bruce L. Mason, Eleni Epiphaniou, Irene J. Higginson, Clare Ellis-Smith, Lesley Henson, Dan Munday, Veronica Nanton, Jeremy R. Dale, Kirsty Boyd, Allison Worth, Stephen Barclay, Anne Donaldson, Scott Murray

Abstract

To develop a model of care coordination for patients living with advanced progressive illness and their unpaid caregivers, and to understand their perspective regarding care coordination.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 78 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 19%
Social Sciences 13 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 9 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,409,612
of 17,358,590 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#33,108
of 164,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,849
of 196,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#782
of 3,654 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,358,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,654 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.