↓ Skip to main content

The Real-World Problem of Care Coordination: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study with Patients Living with Advanced Progressive Illness and Their Unpaid Caregivers

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Real-World Problem of Care Coordination: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study with Patients Living with Advanced Progressive Illness and Their Unpaid Caregivers
Published in
PLoS ONE, May 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0095523
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara A. Daveson, Richard Harding, Cathy Shipman, Bruce L. Mason, Eleni Epiphaniou, Irene J. Higginson, Clare Ellis-Smith, Lesley Henson, Dan Munday, Veronica Nanton, Jeremy R. Dale, Kirsty Boyd, Allison Worth, Stephen Barclay, Anne Donaldson, Scott Murray

Abstract

To develop a model of care coordination for patients living with advanced progressive illness and their unpaid caregivers, and to understand their perspective regarding care coordination.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Unknown 52 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Unspecified 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 19%
Social Sciences 10 18%
Unspecified 4 7%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 11 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,345,134
of 12,717,714 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#22,674
of 138,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,175
of 189,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#642
of 3,651 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,717,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,651 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.