You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The ancestral flower of angiosperms and its early diversification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms16047 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hervé Sauquet, Maria von Balthazar, Susana Magallón, James A. Doyle, Peter K. Endress, Emily J. Bailes, Erica Barroso de Morais, Kester Bull-Hereñu, Laetitia Carrive, Marion Chartier, Guillaume Chomicki, Mario Coiro, Raphaël Cornette, Juliana H. L. El Ottra, Cyril Epicoco, Charles S. P. Foster, Florian Jabbour, Agathe Haevermans, Thomas Haevermans, Rebeca Hernández, Stefan A. Little, Stefan Löfstrand, Javier A. Luna, Julien Massoni, Sophie Nadot, Susanne Pamperl, Charlotte Prieu, Elisabeth Reyes, Patrícia dos Santos, Kristel M. Schoonderwoerd, Susanne Sontag, Anaëlle Soulebeau, Yannick Staedler, Georg F. Tschan, Amy Wing-Sze Leung, Jürg Schönenberger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 465 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 54 | 12% |
| Japan | 33 | 7% |
| Thailand | 22 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 4% |
| Canada | 9 | 2% |
| Spain | 8 | 2% |
| Brazil | 6 | 1% |
| Australia | 6 | 1% |
| France | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 61 | 13% |
| Unknown | 242 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 396 | 85% |
| Scientists | 58 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 793 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 793 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 127 | 16% |
| Researcher | 118 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 107 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 105 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 46 | 6% |
| Other | 137 | 17% |
| Unknown | 153 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 404 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 89 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 55 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 34 | 4% |
| Engineering | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 32 | 4% |
| Unknown | 171 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#12,557
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#247
of 58,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186
of 328,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#3
of 822 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 822 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.