↓ Skip to main content

Are Physicians Blameworthy for Iatrogenic Harm Resulting from Unnecessary Genital Surgeries?

Overview of attention for article published in AMA Journal of Ethics, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
79 tweeters
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are Physicians Blameworthy for Iatrogenic Harm Resulting from Unnecessary Genital Surgeries?
Published in
AMA Journal of Ethics, August 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.8.msoc3-1708
Pubmed ID
Abstract

We argue that physicians should, in certain cases, be held accountable by patients and their families for harm caused by "successful" genital surgeries performed for social and aesthetic reasons. We explore the question of physicians' blameworthiness for three types of genital surgeries common in the United States. First, we consider surgeries performed on newborns and toddlers with atypical sex development, or intersex. Second, we discuss routine neonatal male circumcision. Finally, we consider cosmetic vaginal surgery. It is important for physicians not just to know when and why to perform genital surgery, but also to understand how their patients might react to wrongful performance of these procedures. Equally, physicians should know how to respond to their own blameworthiness in socially productive and morally restorative ways.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 28%
Chemical Engineering 2 11%
Psychology 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%