↓ Skip to main content

Determining the Sources of Fine-Grained Sediment Using the Sediment Source Assessment Tool (Sed_SAT)

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determining the Sources of Fine-Grained Sediment Using the Sediment Source Assessment Tool (Sed_SAT)
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2017
DOI 10.3133/ofr20171062
Authors

Gorman Sanisaca, Lillian E., Gellis, Allen C., Lorenz, David L.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Student > Master 3 25%
Other 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 42%
Environmental Science 2 17%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#10,302,184
of 11,614,551 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#1,307
of 1,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,081
of 266,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#114
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,614,551 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.