↓ Skip to main content

Metal vapor micro-jet controls material redistribution in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
338 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
491 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metal vapor micro-jet controls material redistribution in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
Published in
Scientific Reports, June 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-04237-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonny Ly, Alexander M. Rubenchik, Saad A. Khairallah, Gabe Guss, Manyalibo J. Matthews

Abstract

The results of detailed experiments and finite element modeling of metal micro-droplet motion associated with metal additive manufacturing (AM) processes are presented. Ultra high speed imaging of melt pool dynamics reveals that the dominant mechanism leading to micro-droplet ejection in a laser powder bed fusion AM is not from laser induced recoil pressure as is widely believed and found in laser welding processes, but rather from vapor driven entrainment of micro-particles by an ambient gas flow. The physics of droplet ejection under strong evaporative flow is described using simulations of the laser powder bed interactions to elucidate the experimental results. Hydrodynamic drag analysis is used to augment the single phase flow model and explain the entrainment phenomenon for 316 L stainless steel and Ti-6Al-4V powder layers. The relevance of vapor driven entrainment of metal micro-particles to similar fluid dynamic studies in other fields of science will be discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 491 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 490 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 146 30%
Researcher 79 16%
Student > Master 47 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 7%
Student > Bachelor 17 3%
Other 50 10%
Unknown 116 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 200 41%
Materials Science 92 19%
Physics and Astronomy 13 3%
Computer Science 4 <1%
Chemistry 3 <1%
Other 21 4%
Unknown 158 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2023.
All research outputs
#692,637
of 24,657,405 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#7,547
of 134,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,986
of 321,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#252
of 4,529 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,657,405 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,529 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.