↓ Skip to main content

Fish Food in the Deep Sea: Revisiting the Role of Large Food-Falls

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
83 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fish Food in the Deep Sea: Revisiting the Role of Large Food-Falls
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0096016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas D. Higgs, Andrew R. Gates, Daniel O. B. Jones

Abstract

The carcasses of large pelagic vertebrates that sink to the seafloor represent a bounty of food to the deep-sea benthos, but natural food-falls have been rarely observed. Here were report on the first observations of three large 'fish-falls' on the deep-sea floor: a whale shark (Rhincodon typus) and three mobulid rays (genus Mobula). These observations come from industrial remotely operated vehicle video surveys of the seafloor on the Angola continental margin. The carcasses supported moderate communities of scavenging fish (up to 50 individuals per carcass), mostly from the family Zoarcidae, which appeared to be resident on or around the remains. Based on a global dataset of scavenging rates, we estimate that the elasmobranch carcasses provided food for mobile scavengers over extended time periods from weeks to months. No evidence of whale-fall type communities was observed on or around the carcasses, with the exception of putative sulphide-oxidising bacterial mats that outlined one of the mobulid carcasses. Using best estimates of carcass mass, we calculate that the carcasses reported here represent an average supply of carbon to the local seafloor of 0.4 mg m(-2)d(-1), equivalent to ∼ 4% of the normal particulate organic carbon flux. Rapid flux of high-quality labile organic carbon in fish carcasses increases the transfer efficiency of the biological pump of carbon from the surface oceans to the deep sea. We postulate that these food-falls are the result of a local concentration of large marine vertebrates, linked to the high surface primary productivity in the study area.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Namibia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 194 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 20%
Researcher 40 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 18%
Student > Master 20 10%
Other 7 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 36 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 37%
Environmental Science 33 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 1%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 49 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 169. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2023.
All research outputs
#247,596
of 25,913,612 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,582
of 226,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,920
of 243,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#79
of 4,736 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,913,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,736 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.