↓ Skip to main content

Crossing Boundaries in a Collaborative Modeling Workspace

Overview of attention for article published in Society & Natural Resources, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Crossing Boundaries in a Collaborative Modeling Workspace
Published in
Society & Natural Resources, March 2017
DOI 10.1080/08941920.2017.1290178
Authors

Jeffrey T. Morisette, Amanda E. Cravens, Brian W. Miller, Marian Talbert, Colin Talbert, Catherine Jarnevich, Michelle Fink, Karin Decker, Eric A. Odell

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 32%
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Master 5 20%
Unspecified 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 8 32%
Environmental Science 7 28%
Social Sciences 6 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2017.
All research outputs
#10,249,564
of 11,553,067 outputs
Outputs from Society & Natural Resources
#375
of 403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,567
of 264,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Society & Natural Resources
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,553,067 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 403 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.