↓ Skip to main content

Extracellular vesicles as an emerging mechanism of cell-to-cell communication

Overview of attention for article published in Endocrine, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracellular vesicles as an emerging mechanism of cell-to-cell communication
Published in
Endocrine, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12020-012-9839-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ciro Tetta, Ezio Ghigo, Lorenzo Silengo, Maria Chiara Deregibus, Giovanni Camussi

Abstract

The concept that extracellular vesicles may act as paracrine/endocrine effectors is based on the evidence that they are able to transport bioactive molecules between cells, either within a defined microenvironment or remotely, by entering the biologic fluids. Extracellular vesicles, including exosomes and microvesicles, may deliver lipids and various functional transcripts, released from the cell of origin, to target cells. Since extracellular vesicles contain defined patterns of mRNA, microRNA, long non-coding RNA, and occasionally genomic DNA, they may transfer genetic information which induces transient or persistent phenotypic changes in recipient cells. In this review, we will discuss potential physiologic and pathological implications of extracellular vesicles, as well as the diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities that they may provide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 340 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 20%
Researcher 54 16%
Student > Master 41 12%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 85 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 77 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 4%
Neuroscience 13 4%
Other 35 10%
Unknown 92 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,592,765
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Endocrine
#250
of 1,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,991
of 277,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endocrine
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.