You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Seismically invisible fault zones: Laboratory insights into imaging faults in anisotropic rocks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geophysical Research Letters, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/2017gl073726 |
| Authors |
C. M. Kelly, D. R. Faulkner, A. Rietbrock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 15% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 80% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 24% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 29 | 59% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2017.
All research outputs
#2,460,121
of 24,411,829 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#4,588
of 20,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,355
of 291,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#88
of 350 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,411,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 350 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.