↓ Skip to main content

Bee Species Diversity Enhances Productivity and Stability in a Perennial Crop

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
59 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
312 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bee Species Diversity Enhances Productivity and Stability in a Perennial Crop
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0097307
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shelley R. Rogers, David R. Tarpy, Hannah J. Burrack

Abstract

Wild bees provide important pollination services to agroecoystems, but the mechanisms which underlie their contribution to ecosystem functioning--and, therefore, their importance in maintaining and enhancing these services-remain unclear. We evaluated several mechanisms through which wild bees contribute to crop productivity, the stability of pollinator visitation, and the efficiency of individual pollinators in a highly bee-pollination dependent plant, highbush blueberry. We surveyed the bee community (through transect sampling and pan trapping) and measured pollination of both open- and singly-visited flowers. We found that the abundance of managed honey bees, Apis mellifera, and wild-bee richness were equally important in describing resulting open pollination. Wild-bee richness was a better predictor of pollination than wild-bee abundance. We also found evidence suggesting pollinator visitation (and subsequent pollination) are stabilized through the differential response of bee taxa to weather (i.e., response diversity). Variation in the individual visit efficiency of A. mellifera and the southeastern blueberry bee, Habropoda laboriosa, a wild specialist, was not associated with changes in the pollinator community. Our findings add to a growing literature that diverse pollinator communities provide more stable and productive ecosystem services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 303 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 18%
Student > Master 52 17%
Researcher 50 16%
Student > Bachelor 36 12%
Other 19 6%
Other 54 17%
Unknown 45 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 178 57%
Environmental Science 50 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 1%
Engineering 3 <1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 58 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 132. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#306,716
of 25,040,629 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,384
of 217,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,509
of 233,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#103
of 4,693 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,040,629 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,693 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.